Although we have a goodly number of  claimants  already, we are happy to increase their number right up to the date when we send the  Letters Before Claim (LsBC)  to the Government's Solicitors.

There is no possibility of there being a financial penalty for taking part in this  LBC stage of our legal Group Challenge because there is no involvement in Court proceedings.  Claimants are free to withdraw their participation  AFTER the Government Solicitors have sent us their final replies and before any Court action. Court action, however, is not a given but we have to be ready to broaden our challenge.

We hope, however, that our Claimants will stay the course if we do go to Court. In anticipation of this eventuality, we will continue our crowdfunding so that we can pay any adverse costs being awarded to the Government should the judgement go against us. It is our intention that no Claimant will personally become liable to pay adverse costs.

People who become our claimants must be 18 or over and must live or work in fluoridated (Group A) and threatened (Group B) English areas.

A third group exists for those who are not currently fluoridated nor threatened. They must also be aged 18 and over when the threat materialises and must work or live in England (Group C). This is our "reserve list". They will be called on if news breaks that they are to be included in a fluoridation proposal.

Because our Claimants are required to enter into a formal agreement with our Barrister, there is an admin. cost for the contract of £24 inc. VAT (£6 inc. VAT for hardship) for Group A and B claimants.

If visitors to this site have any questions not explained in this page, please email Joy Warren (the lead Claimant) on  wmaf@live.co.uk  . Joy will also discuss requests for paying the lower admin. fee.

A second source of information on this Group Challenge is available on a partner website where potential claimants can now register to become claimants. This is  www.kingfisherjustice.co.uk .

Why Donate or Volunteer?

There is now very strong science showing that the practice of water fluoridation causes damage to the developing foetal brain resulting in a loss of IQ, increased ADHD in infants, Autism, plus endocrine disruption (thyroid, pancreas) and hip brittle-bone fractures inter alia in adults.

Worryingly, the UK Government and its Establishment refuses to acknowledge this science and has never commissioned any toxicology studies. It is also ignoring the findings of two recently funded UK dental studies which show little benefit from water fluoridation. This inexplicable attitude has even reached the BBC which is guilty of broadcasting mistruths - no doubt because the Establishment has told them to massage the facts.

In Scotland, fluoridation is not permitted due to Lord Jauncey’s 1983 Ruling which stated that fluoridation is medication without an individual’s informed consent and which violates our Human Rights. Because of this ruling, Scotland has implemented a very successful tooth-brushing programme in schools. (CHILDSMILE)

Most people recognise that toothbrushing and reducing sugary foods and drinks is the best way of reducing tooth decay. Fluoridating everyone is a sledge hammer approach!

In October 2024, following the US Court Ruling, three eminent professors of toxicology and environmental health, wrote to PM Kier Starmer explaining the problems and arguing against the practice. However, regardless of this science and common-sense, Ministers continue with dogmatic insistence that water fluoridation is safe and effective and are determined to push ahead with increasing fluoridation in the North-East of England and in other English counties.

This insistence on safety and efficacy are both fallacious and negligent. We have examples of such folly from the past: lead in petrol, lead in paint, DDT, asbestos building materials and smoking whilst pregnant. All were considered ‘safe’ in their day, by ‘experts’. That was, until the science caught up and demonstrated that they were most definitely not safe and were banned.

The same conclusion now has to be drawn over the dangers caused by exposure to fluoride in drinking water, especially when the source of the fluoride is a hazardous waste acid (Hexafluorosilicic acid) from the phosphate fertilizer industry and which is banned in Europe!  "Fluoride" has been given a cosy reputation by PR experts. it's a protected pollutant which is essential in industrial processes so it must be good to swallow! Throughout its history the adage "give a dog a bad name" has been vigorously kept out of the picture by industrialists, their lobbying groups and influential people with vested interests. We detect the powerful influence of "The Establishment" which is believed to be the real power behind successive Governments. The Napoleonic "iron hand in a velvet glove" and Edward Bernays "invisible persuasion" both flourish today. It's not pleasant to contemplate being manipulated by those who we had hoped would look after us.

Since the Government refuses to engage in the conversation we’re calling for a full moratorium on the practice of water fluoridation through a legal Group Challenge.

Many have joined already. However, in order to succeed, we are asking for many more volunteers to become members of the "Groups". To qualify, volunteers must be over 18 and live or work in England in areas fluoridated (Group A) or threatened with fluoridation (Group B). Group C is our "reserve" list for people who object to fluoridation but who are not yet fluoridated nor threatened. We've listed the threatened areas below. Post codes which are already fluoridated are listed in the final section of :

Other Highlights on this Website

Radioactive Iodine

by Dr Joseph Mercola, 31st March 2022

The extract below is part of a longer article which Dr Mercola has posted on his website.  It's published here because it has direct relevance to the issue that fluoride lowers thyroid function.

"How to Optimize Your Iodine Absorption

While women have a greater incidence of iodine deficiency related to their hormone production, the bodies of both men and women are subject to the poor absorption of iodine and suboptimal use due to environmental contamination that end up in the food supply.

Common contaminants that compete with iodine are listed below. By avoiding or eliminating these from your diet, you can help optimize iodine uptake from the iodine-rich foods you eat, some of which were listed earlier.

• Bromide — Bromides are known endocrine disruptors found in baked goods, pesticides and plastics, among other sources. Because bromide is a halide, it competes for the same receptors used in your thyroid gland and other body areas to capture iodine, thereby inhibiting thyroid hormone production and resulting in a deficiency.
• Fluoride — Fluoride has long been known to displace iodine. As cited by the Fluoride Action Network,23 Chinese researchers “have repeatedly found that an iodine deficiency coupled with fluoride exposure produces a significantly more damaging effect on neurological development than iodine deficiency alone.”
• Nitrates — While there are healthy nitrates, the ones found in processed meats such as bacon, hot dogs, lunch meat and sausage may interfere with your uptake of iodine, so be sure to avoid them. Nitrates from agricultural fertilizer, present in contaminated drinking water, have also been implicated as a potential cause of thyroid cancer.24
• Perchlorate — A contaminant found in groundwater across the U.S. and in measurable amounts in milk, fruit and vegetables. In high doses, perchlorate may inhibit the function of your thyroid gland. Even in low doses, it inhibits the uptake of iodine by your thyroid gland, leading to hypothyroidism.25,26"

The entire article and comprehensive citations can be found via the link below.

Magnesium - The Tooth Enhancer

Perhaps it isn't fluoride which strengthens teeth after all .....

In 2019, the 5-year-old children's Oral Health Survey found that 50% of the children they examined had dental decay into dentine in Ladywood (Birmingham), and rather high levels of tooth decay in Hodge Hill and Acocks Green Yardley.  This was a finding which should have worried the pro-fluoridationists sick because those parts of Birmingham had been fluoridated since 1964.  (In fact all of Birmingham and the West Midlands are fluoridated.) 

All three districts of Birmingham are provided with water from the Elan Valley.  This water is treated at Frankley Water Treatment Works (WTW) prior to being fluoridated and then distributed.  Elan Valley water is very low in magnesium.  We've obtained a table of magnesium levels in drinking water throughout West Midlands.  The shock came when we looked at the results for the WTW zones downstream and to the east of Frankley WTW. 

Recommended concentrations of magnesium for adult men and women are 350 and 270 mg/litre respectively.  The recommended concentration for children would be between 100 and 200 mg/day.   So when we saw the concentration of magnesium in water provided to Ladywood, Hodgehill and Acocks Green Yardley, our suspicious whiskers started quivering.  All three districts receive between 1.4 - 1.73 mg Magnesium/litre !

Magnesium is essential for tooth and bone health.  According to the Weston A Price Foundation (https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/abcs-of-nutrition/magnificent-magnesium/#gsc.tab=0 ), magnesium  enables calcium to be taken up by both. 

The scandal of WF is that it injects a developmental neurotoxin into our drinking water and neglects the science which has found that it is magnesium which is the unsung hero. 

Processed food is deficient in magnesium and supplementation is beyond the budgets of disadvantaged families.