UKFFFA’s first national conference in London in January, brought together active campaigners from around the country. The day included presentations from the current coordinators and viewing a selection of the best films from current and past experts. The major event was a ‘World Cafe’ type discussion, a format that allows everyone to have their say on how fluoridation can be prevented and existing schemes terminated. A summary of the outcomes of the discussion have been circulated to all participants, and a number of the activists are meeting in April to decide the next steps. The issues to be considered will include:
How should the UKFFFA undertake the role of a national anti-fluoridation organisation?
What is its purpose and what are its values and ethics?
How should it be structured an how should it be financed?
What should be the most immediate campaign issues?
How should it tackle the many other tasks should it be undertaking – and , or course, who is going to do the work?
There was plenty of support and enthusiasm for a new approach to working together to obtain the results we all want – an alliance of people who want a UK free from fluoride.
More of the decisions and plans will be on this page over the next few weeks. Supporters are welcome to send any comments via the ukfffa web site and to read and post to the Facebook page safewaterinformation.org
Meanwhile, those unable to come mihgt like to have a floavour of he day by vieing some of the films selected for viewing , either oin part or whole. All of these are freeely availble – just follow the links
Films selected for UKFFFA CONFERENCE, 13TH January 2018
|Speaker||YouTube url and details||Length|
How Fluoride Poisons You
Including: explaining enzymes and the fluoride time line
Fluoride – What they don’t tell you about its side effects
Cancer, science and politics.
Fluoride is Poison Brainwash Update
Kent University Research into hypothyroidism.
The final conclusion is that hypo is higher in fluoridated areas .
Current threats Prime concern at the moment: Durham and to a lesser extent, Sheffield.
Updates on the current situation will be added to the ‘Current Threats’ page over the coming weeks .
Declan Waugh takes advantage of the abortion debate in Ireland:
LETTER: Fluoride toxicity is entirely preventable
Send your letters to firstname.lastname@example.org
SIR – Speaking on RTÉ’s ‘Today with Sean O’Rourke’ last Thursday (February 1st), Tánaiste Simon Coveney made a point that politicians are lawmakers, and he reiterated that the function of the Irish State and constitution is to protect the rights and welfare of unborn children as well as the mother.
Yet, paradoxically, Irish politicians as lawmakers, remain the only politicians in Europe that support government legislation that mandates every citizen or resident in this State must consume fluoride through mandatory fluoridation of drinking water supplies.
In the current debate on the repeal of the 8th Amendment and guaranteeing the right to life of the unborn child, it is important to note that the current weight of evidence show that environmental exposure to fluoride effects many organs including the reproductive system. In particular, fluoride has been found to be associated with reproductive disorders, including infertility, low birth weight and neurotoxicity in offspring.
The most recent study published in September 2017 in the peer-reviewed journal, Environmental Health Perspectives, by a team of investigators at the University of Toronto, McGill, the Harvard School of Public Health, and other institutions found an association between prenatal exposure to fluoride and cognitive development disorders in children.
This study affirms that prenatal fluoride toxicity is an entirely preventable problem and that by working to reduce exposure and by reducing its unnecessary use, it is possible to remove fluoride exposure as a factor that limits children’s opportunities to reach their full potential.
As artificial fluoridation of drinking water is enacted by national legislation in Ireland and the mandatory ingestion of fluoride is undertaken without consent, perhaps the Government might allow a second referendum so that the public may vote on whether they wish to ingest this toxin.
Since most of Local Authorities in Ireland, including Cork City and County Councils have already voted for the abolition of water fluoridation in this State and their democratic vote has been ignored by this Government, it’s time that the public had a say on this highly-controversial and outdated policy.
Reports and Research
Links in blue are to the original articles. Many shorter articles in letters are reproduced in full and a more detailed summary of others is available here: Just scroll down to the article number in red.
News items and links to the sources are also shown in more detail here
1 Video link from FAN: Conference video: Michael Connett on the legal action now under way. A MUST SEE video, app. 22 minutes.
2 The dangers of fluoridation by Robert C. Dickson, and Hardy Limeback,
Dr. Dickson and Dr. Limeback ‘s OpEd includes: fluoride’s impact on IQ, the costs of the practice versus the potential benefits, and the ongoing concerns about fluoride’s effect on IQ and the cost of fluoridation that far exceeds its claimed benefit
3 Second major setback for EPA in fluoride lawsuit under TSCA
From FAN : Court rebuffs attempt to limit scope in review of citizen petition A federal judge has handed the US EPA its second defeat, in a lawsuit that could end up setting precedent for how the judiciary handles citizen petitions for chemical regulation under TSCA.
Learned comment from the National Law Review
and FAN’.s comment from, Michael Connett, This court’s decision highlights for environmental groups that Congress created a powerful tool.”
4 The Second in-Utero IQ Study
This study by Valdez Jiménez et al. was published in March 2017 in the journal Neurotoxicology and titled: In utero exposure to fluoride and cognitive development delay in infants. Results: The authors state, “…Our data suggests that cognitive alterations in children born from exposed mothers to F could start in early prenatal stages of life.”…
5 The Bashash study
FAN’s comment It is difficult to overstate the importance of this study, especially since it was funded by these U.S. agencies: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the EPA.
And part of a further comment to the New York Times Science Staff on their indifference to Fluoridation
… the study by Bashash et al. (2017), funded by U.S. government agencies has… reported an astonishing loss of 5 to 6 IQ points which correlated with fluoride urine levels ranging from 0.5 and 1.5 mg/L in pregnant mothers. These are the same levels in adults reported in U.S. communities with fluoridated drinking water (0.6 and 1.5 mg/L)…
6 Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6–12 Years of Age in Mexico
A reminder of the link to this crucial research published in Environmental Health Perspectives; https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/ehp655/
7 Fluorosis demonstrates toxicity
A FAN Press release on the 73rd anniversary of the stat of the first scheme at Grand Rapids, citing and commenting on research report in the Journal of Public Health Dentistry, That Children are fluoride overdosed, from all sources, at levels once thought to protect against dental fluorosis (discoloured teeth).
8 Featured letters
First, an excellent experience-based letter in response to an earlier article from Delta Discovery, Anchorage, Alaska
‘… I have suffered many ailments from overexposure to fluoride starting with dental fluorosis proceeding to GERD, hyperparathyroidism, thyroid goitre, kidney stones etc.
My health has improved as documented in lab reports by avoiding fluoride. ..’
An extract from another good letter focusing on the lack of evidence found by Cochrane and the dangers including reminds us of the conclusion, Cathy Justus Pagosa Springs, CO
And a good simple letter from Jack Crowther, followed by much trolling
9 Back to Burk and Yiamouyiannis
A writer from Oberon Australian asks readers to check the link below to Burk on Cancer
SWIS comments on its acceptance and the presentation by Yiamouyiannis shown at the recent UKFFFA conference – see third film listed above.
Fuller summaries of all these items with links to sources are here following the reports shown above
Massachusetts: There is a pending bill in the state Senate (S. 1226) that proposes to ban the fluoridation of drinking water in all of Massachusetts
Edgarton, Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts: Board of health will be holding a forum
Newport RI At passionate, fluoride opponent has taken his argument to City Hall,
Spotsylvania VT … Board of Supervisors Chairman proposes “informational statement and/or warning” on water bills.
Springfield, Clark County, Ohio Fluoride could be placed on the ballot in November.
Montreal: new pipes to be installed to link non-fluoridated Lachine with fluoridated Dorval and Pointe-Claire
Parry Sound In October, voters for councillors and mayor will be asked “Are you in favour of the fluoridation of the public water supply of this municipality?”
Sarnia, ON A public meeting on Monday, Feb. 26 is a step to put the question on October’s municipal election ballot. Residents would be asked if they are in favour of removing fluoride from municipal drinking water….
Bega, NSW the survey conducted by the Bega Valley Council on fluoridating our water supply as flawed’. . This town has made its opposition clear to no avail, with the infamous survey’ based on a leading question, still being used.
Yanchep, Perth, Western Australia: YANCHEP tapped into Perth’s main fluoridated water supply several weeks ago. Yanchep resident Melanie Waldron said she felt “bitterly let down”
New South Wales: Labor introduced legislation in the NSW Parliament to create tough new fluoride laws it claims would ‘override the anti-fluoride movement’ and effectively force councils like Byron Shire to fluoridate their water….
Reports on Paul Connett’s tour and meeting in the Parliament
Including link to 10 -minute video of TV interview